![]() ![]() My only complaint about Norton really is it persistently writes ~7KB/s.not a lot but it is always doing it. As of right now Norton AV is among the best in terms of resource usage.along with Comodo, Eset, Panda and a few others. If you're not I can't help you.Norton AV used to be a tremendous resource hog, but not since their "2009" product when they completely revamped the engine/daemon. If you are behind a NAT and SPI Firewall all you need is Microsoft Security Essentials if u are a Windows user. If you say/think Norton is a resource hog, please provide some evidence backing this up. Sortofageek, I am not directing this at you, rather to everybody else reading this. Why do I keep seeing people post over and over how Norton is such a resource hog, yet nobody every provides any proof other than "that's what I was told by so-and-so".? Just wanted to point out that compared to Google Chrome, the Norton A/V is a miser when it comes to using memory. As a matter of fact, just comparing memory usage between the Norton app from Comcast and Google Chrome browser.Įleven instances of chrome.exe (why so many for only one open window?) I have it running on three different machines and there are no indications of it being a system hog. Some Norton products were, many years ago, but not now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |